Skip to main content

What Should be NBC's Next Live Musical?



What Should be NBC's Next Live Musical?



With The Wiz Live! being both a critical and ratings success, it seems inevitable that the tradition of the airing a live musical will continue next year. The Sound of Music was a good production of a great musical, Peter Pan was a so-so production of a so-so musical, The Wiz was a great production of a good musical. So what musical should NBC do next? Given the stipulations that whatever musical is chosen, it has to be family friendly and have recognizable songs, there aren't really that many to chose from. Here are some musicals I think could work:



The Music Man (1957) NBC has already optioned the rights to this classic musical, which has plenty of familiar tunes and is family friendly, but after The Wiz's success, NBC is probably more likely to go with something a little more contemporary. Plus, there's already a 1962 film and a 2003 TV movie, so there isn't really a need for a new adaption, unless a big star (someone like Justin Timberlake) is interested. For Marian, Kristen Bell or Laura Benanti would be a good choice.

Annie Get Your Gun (1946) This one is probably too old-fashioned to have mainstream appeal, but the Irving Berlin's songs are very well known, and it might be a good vehicle for either a country music star like Jennifer Nettles, or even someone like Kelly Clarkson. 

Big River (1985) While the musical might not be as well known, the story of Huckleberry Finn certainly is, and it isn't overdone, like Peter Pan. The bluegrass score means country music stars could be cast, and with four separate country music award shows airing every year, there is clearly an audience for seeing country stars on TV. 

Hello, Dolly! (1964) Another older musical that might work today, but is it really as beloved as other musicals from that era? I suppose it is, but that really isn't enough of a reason to do it again. Maybe starring Kristin Chenoweth, or even Queen Latifah (who was excellent in The Wiz).

Oliver! (1960) This seems like a good choice. Familiar story, lots of well-known songs, kid friendly without being kiddie. Perhaps it's not contemporary enough to have wide appeal, but it could be great, if done right.

Rodgers and Hammerstein's Cinderella (1956) A logical choice for consideration, at least. First done as a live musical starring Julie Andrews, Cinderella was seen by over a hundred million viewers. But, much like Peter Pan, this story has been done to death. With two more (non-live) TV versions already existing, there really is no need for another one, no matter who they can get to star.

The Addams Family (2009) A more modern choice might connect more with the audience than a musical from decades ago, so why not The Addams Family? It's really a decades old property made into a contemporary musical, but it ran on Broadway for a couple of years not too long ago and has since become a popular choice for schools to put on. Both the book and score would need a lot of work before it would be ready for TV and it wouldn't be worth doing at all if they couldn't get Bebe Neuwirth to reprise her role as Morticia. 

You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown (1968) A very unlikely choice would be this intimate (six actors and basically no set) musical. it wouldn't have the spectacle factor this type of event really needs in order to draw a crowd and it definitely could not be stretched to be three hours long, but the Peanuts characters are so beloved, I could see this working even without a huge budget or big names involved. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scoob! Review: Scooby Doo's Big Screen Reboot is a Dud

The new film, premiering in people's homes because movie theaters are closed, is an attempt to launch a new shared cinematic universe based on old Hanna-Barbera cartoons. The result is characters from other old shows getting awkardly interpolated in the story of the Mystery Inc gang. Dynomutt and the Blue Falcon (Dynomutt, Dog Wonder) show up, as does DeeDee (Captain Caveman and the Teen Angels, whatever that is). The main villain is Dick Dastardly (Wacky Races), who comes complete with some Minions ripoff robot sidekicks and a plan that involves opening a portal to the underworld or something. It's all very incongruous with the classic Scooby formula, in which the supernatural was almost always revealed to be smoke and mirrors. 
The humor is aggressively topical, referencing smartphones and Tinder and Hemsworths. None of it is very funny, least of all a cameo by Simon Cowell. Is he still relevant? 
Like the recent Charlie's Angles reboot, Scoob! drags its source material in…

Ranking the "Mission: Impossible" Films Worst to Best

The Mission: Impossible movies, based on the 1966-73 television series, are about Ethan Hunt and the Impossible Mission Force doing something that seems impossible at first, but always ends up being possible. Tom Cruise stars in all the films as Ethan, and other members of the team are Luther (Ving Rhames) and Benji (Simon Pegg). I like the Mission: Impossible movies because each film has a different director and thus each one has their own distinctive feel. Sure, there are a couple of constants (Cruise is in them all, they all are spy/action movies, and they all have people wearing masks - a nod to the TV show), but going into a Mission: Impossible movie you are never quite sure what you are going to get. Sometimes it's a silly fun spy franchise, other times it feels like nothing more than an excuse for Tom Cruise do to some sort of crazy stunt. Since the first film was released in 1996, there have been five movies, with a sixth on the way. Here's how I would rank the movies …

Hollwood Surprises No One at Most Self-Congratulatory Award Show of Year: Golden Globes Review

Golden Globes 2017: Review

The Golden Globes are the most pointless award show all season. They are not given by critics or people working in the industry, but rather the HFPA, a group of 89 foreign journalists who are notoriously susceptible to bribes. They nominate sometimes awful films and performances in hopes big stars will show up to their party. It is necessary when selecting a host to find someone who wouldn't feed into the HFPA's already inflated sense of self-importance. Why Amy Poehler and Tina Fey were the ideal hosts for this show is because their jokes, while very funny, were also pointed attacks at the HFPA, the individual stars in attendance, and the celebrity complex as a whole. Ricky Gervais had the same basic idea, except less mean and thus less funny. I was nervous when in August when they announced Jimmy Fallon, the talk show host with a reputation for being nice, as the host of this year's Globes. Turns out I was right to be nervous that Fallon wouldn…