Skip to main content

New "Twin Peaks" is a Puzzling and Maddening Experience: Review

TV Review: "Twin Peaks: The Return"

Image result for twin peaks: The return
Disclaimer: This review contains major spoilers for the original Twin Peaks and minor spoilers for Twin Peaks: The Return.

The original Twin Peaks, created by Mark Frost and David Lynch, is one of the most beloved and iconic television series of all time, despite only running for 30 episodes on ABC in 1990 and 1991.  Heavily influenced by daytime soap operas, it featured several hallmarks of that genre: a sleepy town, an ensemble of wacky characters, an ongoing mystery, and the illicit and adulterous underside of the facade of a wholesome American small town. Of course it was also more that, and as the series went on it became more of a supernatural exploration of good and evil, but the soapy trappings gave the series a shape and a structure. The highly anticipated revival miniseries, now airing on Showtime, eschews shape and structure altogether in favor a more puzzling, maddening creation.

Image result for twin peaks: The returnEver since Dallas started the trend back in 2012, many continuations of old shows have sprung up, among them Arrested Development, Gilmore Girls, and soon Will & Grace and Roseanne. These shows cash in on nostalgia for the old show, as a way to tell new stories in an already-established world. While this trend is what made Twin Peaks: The Return possible in the first place, it was clearly not the intention of Frost and Lynch to pick up where they left off in 1991. The new show is almost nothing like the old show in story, tone, or form. This time, the melodrama has been completely excised. Large portions of the first four episodes are taken up by characters we have never seen before, and very little of it actually takes place in the town of Twin Peaks. Perhaps it is not fair to judge the series based on what I personally wanted it to be, but it seems Lynch is fully aware that people were expecting a return of the old show, as short scenes with familiar characters like Dr. Jacoby (Russ Tamblyn) and Shelly Johnson (Madchen Amick) are interspersed throughout the first few episodes. This subversion of audience expectations is classic Lynch, but whether it's to the benefit of the series remains to be seen.

I will not give away too much of the plot of the new show, not because I want you all to watch it unspoiled, but rather I do not think I could describe much of what happens. To say this show is confusing is an understatement. The original Twin Peaks ended on a great cliffhanger, with Agent Dale Cooper (Kyle MacLachlan) trapped in the Black Lodge and his doppelgänger possessed by the evil spirit BOB returning to Twin Peaks. Laura Palmer (Sheryl Lee) coyly tells Cooper "I'll see you in 25 years". 26 years later, Laura returns to tell Cooper he can leave, but his doppelgänger is still out there. There is also stuff about a mysterious box in New York and a murder investigation in South Dakota, and a couple other subplots whose relevance is unclear. Lynch is not the type of director who ties together loose ends or answers half of the questions the audience has. It is fully possible that several of the mysteries introduced in the first four episodes will not even be mentioned in the remaining twelve. 

I don't mean to say that the original was perfect and this is garbage. The second season of the original series is far from perfect, as pressure from the network caused the reveal of Laura Palmer's killer to be rushed (although the imperfect prequel movie Fire Walk with Me did fill in some of the blanks regarding that storyline), and the episodes that immediate follow that resolution are pretty terrible. The last six or so episodes of the season quicken the pace and things pick up quite a bit, culminating in a stunning finale. One of the main flaws of the original is that it has a bunch of talented actors given interesting characters but no story and were hardly ever seen. Among the shortchanged were Amick's Shelly, Audrey Horne (Sherilyn Fenn), Ed Hurley (Everett McGill), and Norma Jennings (Peggy Lipton). The revival seems to have no desire to rectify past injustices, as Amick (who is also fantastic on the Twin Peaks-inspired Riverdale) is the only one make an appearance thus far, and that was just a cameo. 

Some enjoyment can be derived from the new series if you like celebrity cameos. The first four episodes rival any Muppet movie for most number of unnecessary but still welcome guest appearances. So far the guests have included Ashley Judd, Matthew Lillard, socialite Cornelia Guest, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Michael Cera (doing a bizarre Marlon Brando impression), and Naomi Watts. One part of the new series that was genuinely terrific was the phone conversations between two classic Peaks characters; Hawk (Michael Horse) and Margaret, the Log Lady (Catherine E. Coulson) , especially poignant because the scenes were filmed shortly before Coulson's 2015 death. 

I will continue to watch Twin Peaks: The Return, which airs through September, fully expecting none of my questions to be answered. Even if the experience of watching strange other worlds and abstract, incomprehensible images can be extremely challenging at times, I am taking it as a 2017 variation on the themes explored so richly on the original series. Not a continuation exactly, more like a complementary viewing experience.

What do you think of Twin Peaks: The Return? Let me know in the comments below!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scoob! Review: Scooby Doo's Big Screen Reboot is a Dud

The new film, premiering in people's homes because movie theaters are closed, is an attempt to launch a new shared cinematic universe based on old Hanna-Barbera cartoons. The result is characters from other old shows getting awkardly interpolated in the story of the Mystery Inc gang. Dynomutt and the Blue Falcon (Dynomutt, Dog Wonder) show up, as does DeeDee (Captain Caveman and the Teen Angels, whatever that is). The main villain is Dick Dastardly (Wacky Races), who comes complete with some Minions ripoff robot sidekicks and a plan that involves opening a portal to the underworld or something. It's all very incongruous with the classic Scooby formula, in which the supernatural was almost always revealed to be smoke and mirrors. 
The humor is aggressively topical, referencing smartphones and Tinder and Hemsworths. None of it is very funny, least of all a cameo by Simon Cowell. Is he still relevant? 
Like the recent Charlie's Angles reboot, Scoob! drags its source material in…

Ranking the "Mission: Impossible" Films Worst to Best

The Mission: Impossible movies, based on the 1966-73 television series, are about Ethan Hunt and the Impossible Mission Force doing something that seems impossible at first, but always ends up being possible. Tom Cruise stars in all the films as Ethan, and other members of the team are Luther (Ving Rhames) and Benji (Simon Pegg). I like the Mission: Impossible movies because each film has a different director and thus each one has their own distinctive feel. Sure, there are a couple of constants (Cruise is in them all, they all are spy/action movies, and they all have people wearing masks - a nod to the TV show), but going into a Mission: Impossible movie you are never quite sure what you are going to get. Sometimes it's a silly fun spy franchise, other times it feels like nothing more than an excuse for Tom Cruise do to some sort of crazy stunt. Since the first film was released in 1996, there have been five movies, with a sixth on the way. Here's how I would rank the movies …

Hollwood Surprises No One at Most Self-Congratulatory Award Show of Year: Golden Globes Review

Golden Globes 2017: Review

The Golden Globes are the most pointless award show all season. They are not given by critics or people working in the industry, but rather the HFPA, a group of 89 foreign journalists who are notoriously susceptible to bribes. They nominate sometimes awful films and performances in hopes big stars will show up to their party. It is necessary when selecting a host to find someone who wouldn't feed into the HFPA's already inflated sense of self-importance. Why Amy Poehler and Tina Fey were the ideal hosts for this show is because their jokes, while very funny, were also pointed attacks at the HFPA, the individual stars in attendance, and the celebrity complex as a whole. Ricky Gervais had the same basic idea, except less mean and thus less funny. I was nervous when in August when they announced Jimmy Fallon, the talk show host with a reputation for being nice, as the host of this year's Globes. Turns out I was right to be nervous that Fallon wouldn…