Skip to main content

Sofia Coppola's "The Beguiled" is a Tense and Artful Tale of Vengeful Southern Women: Review


Film Review: The Beguiled

    

In 1971, Don Siegel directed two movies, both of which starred Clint Eastwood. One would become a franchise-starting classic; a gritty and violent thriller about a cop who makes his own rules. The other was an oddity in both people's filmographies, an unsettling drama about a Union soldier who attempts to seduce, and then is terrorized by, a group of women at a Southern boarding school, that failed to make any sort of impact at the box office. 46 years later, one of those films has been remade, and it's not Dirty Harry. Siegel's The Beguiled is a strange movie. There are interesting visuals, the camera swoops and swerves and the dim lighting is absolutely haunting. But the film introduces more threads than it has time to invest in, and while it is clear the audience is not supposed to root for the Eastwood character, it's hard to root for the women either, so the audience is left wondering what it is we are supposed to take away from the story. Enter Sofia Coppola.

Coppola, the director of atmospheric tone poems and ethereal odes to ennui, seems a natural fit to direct this tale of isolated women. She's shortened the action, tightened its focus, and aligned our sympathies strictly with the female characters. The story remains intact: a union solider, John McBurney (Colin Farrell), is injured during the Civil War and taken in by the women at Miss Farnsworth's Seminary for Young Ladies to recover. Sexual tensions and intense rivalries boil over between McBurney, the headmistress (Nicole Kidman), the teacher (Kirsten Dunst), and a student (Elle Fanning). Unlike most of Coppola's previous projects, The Beguiled has a plot, with a defined beginning, middle, and end. You occasionally get the sense that Coppola had to remind herself to move on with the plot, resisting the urge to linger in the lush settings that predominated her earlier films. Here the mood is  in service of the story, not the other way around, and Coppola shows a surprising adeptness at creating tension and suspense. 


The cast comprises Coppola's finest ensemble yet. Kidman plays Miss Farnsworth with a steely resolve that quivers in the tender moments she lets her long-supressed desires be known. Fanning is clearly having a blast as the teenage Alicia, who is the most blatant about her attraction to McBurney.  Colin Farrell doesn't have the unimpeachable action hero image that Clint Eastwood had to contend with when he played the wily and opportunistic McBurney. As a result, it's easier for the audience to accept McBurney as the antagonist right out of the gate. We can see the wheels turning in Farrell's McBurney's mind as he plots his manipulations. Eastwood's McBurney was a smoother operator. We wanted to believe him when he softly says he has fallen in love with Edwina, but in the new version that same profession of love elicits laughter.


Image result for the beguiled 2017 kirsten dunstAs terrific as the rest of the cast is, it is no question that Coppola's frequent collaborator Kirsten Dunst is the standout. Dunst plays Edwina, the teacher at Miss Farnsworth's, who longs to be elsewhere and begins to think McBurney is her ticket out. Wistfully staring out the window, Edwina feels trapped by her circumstances, and in that way, she is the character most similar to the ones in Coppola's other films (especially Dunst's previous roles, Lux Lisbon and Marie Antoinette). Elizabeth Hartman, who played Edwina in the '71 version, had wonderfully expressive eyes that screamed sadness and loneliness. Dunst's performance is more restrained by comparison,  more confined than outright depressed. But the isolation comes across just as well, with one glimpse of her melancholic gaze. It's a truly commendable performance, one that if the Oscars recognized subtle performances more than once a decade would certainly garner awards attention. 



 Also worthy of praise are Stacey Battat's splendid period costumes and Philippe Le Sourd's stunning cinematography. The (awesome) French rock band Phoenix provides a great, Monteverdi-inspired score, but Coppola wisely does not overly rely on music to create suspense. There are a few dramatic beats towards the end of the film that play out better in Siegel's film. But what Coppola lacks in conventional dramatic technique, she more than makes up for creating a rich atmosphere, which turns out to be remarkably conducive to the suspense genre. There is no better exemplification of Coppola's skill than the two parallel scenes set at the dinner table. The first one, which occurs about halfway through the film, is a slyly hilarious take on the effects of a man on women. The second one, at the end of the film, is a chillingly tense take on the effects of women on a man. 

Coppola uses a soft palette of whites and pale pinks to portray the Miss Farnsworth school as a beam of femininity and civilization is the midst of a gruesome war. Yes, the women have been affected greatly by the war (as cannons boom in the distance, they are literally trapped), but at the start of the film their gates are untouched by the brutality and the bloodshed that surrounds them. McBurney's arrival changes that. Bloodied and wild, he represents the worst of man's intentions. The film's suggestion on how best for women to combat those intentions is a delightfully macabre treat. 

What did you think of The Beguiled? Where would you rank it among the rest of Coppola's oeuvre? Let me know in the comments below!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

So, what is a reboot, anyway?

The recent news that the upcoming installment of the Scream franchise will be titled simply Scream sparked yet another round of people on the Internet being confused by movie terminology. Most articles about this new Scream movie refer to it as a "relaunch" because if they call it a reboot, then certain people will get up in arms about how it's a sequel and therefore not a reboot due to the participation of Neve Campbell, David Arquette, and Courteney Cox. But, it's not incorrect to call it a reboot, even with those returning stars. 11 years will have passed in between entries by the time this one is released. It has new directors (RIP Wes Craven), new writers, many new characters, and a different studio is behind it. There are too many new elements for it to not be considered a reboot. But continuing the stories of Sidney, Dewey, and Gale means its also a sequel. The terms are not mutually exclusive. Confused? let's define some stuff. “ Reboot ” is an inclusiv

"B Positive" Has Lots of Potential and a Star in Annaleigh Ashford: TV Review

There are few actors working today who I consider to be more talented than Annaleigh Ashford. If the name isn't familiar, let me enlighten you. Annaleigh Ashford has been in several Broadway musicals, including Kinky Boots . She won a Tony Award for playing a wannabe ballerina in You Can't Take It With You . She deserved another Tony for an entirely different but also very funny display of physicality as the titular canine in Sylvia . She proved her dramatic chops with a moving performance as Dot and Marie in a 2017 Broadway revival of Sunday in the Park with George . She broke up all of Helena's lines in a production of Midsummer Night's Dream in Central Park and refitted them into a brilliant comedic mosaic that had the audience in stitches. Apart from her extensive stage work, she appeared for four seasons of the Showtime series Masters of Sex . She had a terrific supporting part in the excellent recent movie Bad Education . And she was reported to be in talks for t

Netflix vs. HBO Max vs. Disney+ vs. Hulu: Streaming Services Ranked

The entertainment industry is at a moment of change. Resources that were once spent on TV networks and theatrical releases are being funneled into streaming services, as media conglomerates race to catch up with game-changing, industry-revolutionizing Netflix. The "streaming wars", the competition between the studios to sure up talent and content deals as they ask audiences to buy their monthly subscriptions, is in full swing.  One day, a book will be written about the streaming wars and it'll include a clear picture of which services crashed and burned and which ones emerged victorious. I look forward to reading that book and looking back on this moment in time with hindsight, but until that day, all I can do is offer my opinion on each service and say which ones I feel are worthy of your money and time. I'm only going to talk about the services that are directly vying to be the new Netflix, not niche ones like Shudder or the Criterion Channel. Also, a proper ranking